my weekend routine essay essay on pollution in hindi 300 words rn cover letter template ventilator associated pneumonia case study case study for carpal tunnel cover letter sample for assistant general manager bowling reflection essay

Movie Review: Judy Moody and the Not Bummer Summer

by Trey Hock on June 10, 2011

in Print Reviews

The signs were all there. No guest would accompany me to the film, the theater was only half full for the screening, I probably should have known, but I decided to give “Judy Moody and the Not Bummer Summer” a fair shake. I can say having sat through its full 91 minutes, that “Judy Moody” is a joyless and un-fun trek through the worst of filmmaking mediocrity.

Let us begin with Judy (Jordana Beatty) herself. As a character this plucky youngster vacillates from annoying at best to thoroughly unlikable at worst. Throughout the film, Judy is mean to her friends, self-centered, selfish, and rude, and it’s all wrapped up and presented as if these flaws were just precociousness, and excited creativity.

I would not mind if Judy seemed to learn from her flaws and mistakes, but instead they just seem to be reaffirmed. There is a thirty-second montage of reflection towards the end, but nowhere in the film is there growth.

On the last day of school, Judy concocts a plan for this to be her best summer ever. She presents a list of challenges to friends, Frank (Preston Bailey), Rocky (Garrett Ryan) and Amy (Taylar Hender). With the completion of each successful challenge, like riding the local roller coaster, a participant will get “thrill points.”

Judy’s plan quickly turns sour when Amy and Rocky reveal they that they are spending the summer away, and Judy’s own parents must go to California, leaving her and brother, Stink (Parris Mosteller), in the care of the loony Aunt Opal (Heather Graham).

Aunt Opal is presented as a free-spirited, guerilla artist, who flits from continent to continent. All I saw was an irresponsible, homeless person, who makes a mess of her brother’s house and adorns trash with her kitschy crafts.

Opal is flat and never seems entirely motivated to either give Judy perspective, which might improve Judy’s attitude, or help her achieve her goal of accumulating thrill points.

Oh Heather Graham, truly you are stuck in the Black Lodge.

At the end of “Judy Moody,” we are given a minute or two where Judy states that her summer has indeed been the best one yet. All of her failed attempts to make it an awesome summer somehow made it awesome. This doesn’t work at all. Judy, up until this moment, has been a pouting, disagreeable grump, and now just because her character is vocalizing the change that one would hope for, it does not make that change real.

To be honest, “Judy Moody” was not made for me. The target audience is 6 to 9 year old girls. Let me just offer this telling observation. The audience that joined me in the theater was comprised mainly of members within that demographic. Elementary school-aged girls surrounded me, and as they watched the film there wasn’t a laugh, giggle, chuckle, gasp, or guffaw. A group that would normally be effervescent with childhood energy was silent for the entire movie.

Mirthless and boring, even the outtakes from “Judy Moody,” which roll over the credits seem utterly joyless. It appears that this film wasn’t even fun to make. It definitely wasn’t fun to watch.

In addition to contributing to Scene-Stealers, Trey makes short films and teaches at the Kansas City Art Institute. Follow him here:

Facebook Twitter Google+ 

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Seth June 10, 2011 at 10:55 am

I will not see this film. Thank you for your self-crucifixion on my behalf.


2 Rosie June 10, 2011 at 11:20 am

That makes me so sad that Heather Graham wasn’t entertaining. Love her.


3 Trey Hock June 10, 2011 at 1:05 pm

Seth, glad to run block for you.

Rosie, this whole experience made me sad.


4 Eric Melin June 10, 2011 at 1:53 pm

“Oh Heather Graham, truly you are stuck in the Black Lodge” made me laugh harder than anything else I’ve read today!


5 Leah Cunnick June 22, 2011 at 10:56 pm

Holy Crap Eric, I can’t believe you even went to see this film!


6 Trey Hock June 23, 2011 at 5:22 am

Leah, Eric didn’t. I did. It was a rough one, but I think we all made it through safely.


7 Vera Mason April 26, 2012 at 6:13 pm

For one thing, it is really sad to find good actors land in awful characters or in projects whose storyline does not add value much to the audience. On the business side, it’s hard to think how producers agreed to do a movie with a weak storyline and unconvincing plot. Six to nine year olds these days are better than what the producers thought they were.

Vera Mason of SpurPress


8 Trey Hock April 27, 2012 at 5:37 am

I agree, Vera. The project must have looked good on paper, I guess.

Thanks for the comment.


9 Jeff Geidt May 7, 2012 at 10:36 pm

It is as what the title suggests. But seeing past that, understanding what makes people tick is really not easy.


10 Jeff Geidt May 11, 2012 at 1:42 am

It’s quite frustrating that in this day and age, there are still film makers and producers who do films that can’t make you figure out what propelled them to spend money making them in the first place. Surely there are many talented writers who can write a more convincing plot that enlightens people and give them better understaning after seeing a film not puzzle them further.


Leave a Comment


Previous post:

Next post: