unhealthy lifestyle essay introduction examples of application letter in a filling station carter racing case study challenger systematic literature review chronic disease management contoh soal essay agama kristen kelas 10 wedding speech ideas sister of the groom

Movie Review: Green Lantern

by Trey Hock on June 17, 2011

in Print Reviews

Hal Jordan (Ryan Reynolds) can’t make up his mind. He doesn’t know whether he wants to be the hotshot flying ace who always has a clever one-liner; the tortured young man, who still suffers from the loss of his father; or the superhero and the dutiful boyfriend. He better hurry up and decide, because a huge energy monster is about to destroy the Earth.

Like Jordan, “Green Lantern” can’t quite decide what type of film it wants to be. Should it be a campy, funny comedy full of tongue in cheek self-references to the absurdity of comic book superheroes, or should it be a more serious story of the reckless young man turned hero. Since neither director Martin Campbell nor the film’s four writers ever seem to fully commit to one or the other, we are given a bizarre mish-mash of “Top Gun” and “The Never Ending Story.”

Our tale begins with a heavy-handed voice over, bringing those of us who are not privy to the ways of the Lantern Corps up to speed. It seems that the Corps, led by the exceedingly purple Abin Sur (Temuera Morrison), have defeated and imprisoned, Parallax, a being so evil that he’s comprised almost entirely out of slow-growing firework snakes.

Parallax escapes, of course, and comes after Abin Sur. In the battle that follows, Abin Sur is wounded but manages to evade Parallax and tumbles to Earth in his glow pod.

On Earth, the reckless yet sensitive Hal Jordan, a hotshot test pilot, finds Abin Sur, and is chosen by the dying alien’s green ring to succeed Abin Sur as a Green Lantern, an intergalactic policeman. This causes Jordan no end of grief as he tries to decide whether he is up to the task for which he has been chosen.

“Green Lantern” has many of the trappings of a silly fun superhero movie. The cartoonish look of the film, with its hyper-color glow effects, is amusing once you accept it, and Peter Sarsgaard is great as the smarmy and villainous Hector Hammond. Even the largely unnecessary 3D effects play into the B-movie quality of the film.

Unfortunately, “Green Lantern” never fully commits to the campiness, and is burdened with too many, too serious characters, like the stony Sinestro (Mark Strong), or the evil Parallax, who tries to up the ante and the scariness as he consumes city streets with his black snake tendrils. Even, the normally plucky and cheerful Reynolds seems to have been miscast for a the role of Jordan, since most of the film calls for him to look sullen and contemplative as his character tries to decide whether the green power ring is meant for him.

“Green Lantern” has a number of fun and funny moments that show us it could have been a stupid fun movie had it embraced its own goofiness. Instead its often-serious tone just serves to accentuate that this is a pretty stupid movie.

In addition to contributing to Scene-Stealers, Trey makes short films and teaches at the Kansas City Art Institute. Follow him here:

Facebook Twitter Google+ 

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Randall June 17, 2011 at 11:11 am

Yeah, it was bad. But so much of the humor fell flat that I wouldn’t have trusted the same filmmakers to embrace that approach, either. “Thor” did much better at balancing the serious and comic, the cosmic and the earthly, and involving the audience in the question of whether the hero is “worthy” of his power.


2 Evan June 17, 2011 at 2:56 pm

“Tongue and cheek”? 😉

Anyway, not really looking forward to this one, but I have a feeling I’m going to end up seeing it anyway. Thanks for the review.


3 Trey Hock June 17, 2011 at 3:09 pm

Nice catch Evan. I made the correction. Must have slipped past my editing radar.


Leave a Comment


Previous post:

Next post: