<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t let the &#8220;Crystal Skull&#8221; scare you off, Indiana Jones makes a triumphant return</title>
	<link>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/</link>
	<description>Movies with Rock</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-7884</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-7884</guid>
		<description>Yeah the movie was pretty good.  Some people have immortalized Indiana Jones in their minds, but I find most people who don't like this probably haven't seen the old ones in a long time.  My biggest issues with this movie are two-fold:
1. Aliens don't belong in an archeology franchise.
2. No mega-gruesome deaths like the previous movies.

Why aliens?  I mean does that mean aliens are responsible for the Ark of the Covenant or the Holy Grail?  I as a human am proud of the accomplishments my species has achieved.  I think the whole idea of a successful archeologist is finding knowledge and wisdom in our past that we may have forgotten or lost.  Having aliens responsible for all of our greatest architectural and cultural achievements is just not an idea that I think Indy should stand for.  

Blowing up heads.  There wasn't enough gore or grisly deaths.  I loved the final scene in Raiders.  I used to hype myself up to see it happen every time and it would always freak me out.  One guy's head melts, the other two explode.  Blood and brains everywhere!  That's entertainment.  So one dude gets eaten by some ants... they could have made that more interesting if his body started splitting up underneath the blanket of ants... but no.  He just went into the hole whole.  And Cate Blanchet's death was anything but gruesome.  

But its good to hear a positive take on the movie, which is ultimately what I left the theater with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah the movie was pretty good.  Some people have immortalized Indiana Jones in their minds, but I find most people who don&#8217;t like this probably haven&#8217;t seen the old ones in a long time.  My biggest issues with this movie are two-fold:<br />
1. Aliens don&#8217;t belong in an archeology franchise.<br />
2. No mega-gruesome deaths like the previous movies.</p>
<p>Why aliens?  I mean does that mean aliens are responsible for the Ark of the Covenant or the Holy Grail?  I as a human am proud of the accomplishments my species has achieved.  I think the whole idea of a successful archeologist is finding knowledge and wisdom in our past that we may have forgotten or lost.  Having aliens responsible for all of our greatest architectural and cultural achievements is just not an idea that I think Indy should stand for.  </p>
<p>Blowing up heads.  There wasn&#8217;t enough gore or grisly deaths.  I loved the final scene in Raiders.  I used to hype myself up to see it happen every time and it would always freak me out.  One guy&#8217;s head melts, the other two explode.  Blood and brains everywhere!  That&#8217;s entertainment.  So one dude gets eaten by some ants&#8230; they could have made that more interesting if his body started splitting up underneath the blanket of ants&#8230; but no.  He just went into the hole whole.  And Cate Blanchet&#8217;s death was anything but gruesome.  </p>
<p>But its good to hear a positive take on the movie, which is ultimately what I left the theater with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam Sharp Sharp Sharp</title>
		<link>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6839</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Sharp Sharp Sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6839</guid>
		<description>I want to be like Henry 'Indiana' Jones.

Ford, just as he did in the first three Indy films portrays a well kept, intrepid and above all cunning adventurer, the dream combination of wits and skill.

This man can do just about anything he likes with a bull whip while at the same time speak about 200 dead languages.And Indy doesn't hold back, whether it be using gun powder to trace a magnetic relic or drop an AK47 on the floor in such a way that he shoots a Russian in the foot, and he does it at ease.

"You don't know im! You don't know im!" screams Ray Winstone's character 'Mac' to one of Indy's foes during a game of chicken between two jeeps inside a military hangar.

This long awaited fourth adventure sees Indiana along with prodigal son 'Mutt' (It's a human being, not some sort of talented animal that George Lucas probably wanted to throw in there) delve into a South American jungle whilst at logger heads with the soviets trying to get to the bottom of what it is exactly the crystal skull they have on them can do. Amazing are some of the opening stunts and I never knew how handy a fridge during a nuclear wipe-out could be.

I'm not the naive 10 year old I was when the original Indy trilogy was put to me in the late nineties so like my grandad I was left saying to myself 'I ain't avin that' at some of the plot revelations and just a couple of the stunts. Like driving off a cliff and landing the vehicle on a branch, and it wasn't even Indiana who pulled that manoeuvre out of the bag.

Being a Brit, I enjoyed seeing Ray Winstone in there and have done a few impressions of him referring to Indiana as 'Jonesy' since seeing the film.

The magic, excitement and interest of the Indiana Jones we know and love is still there and so leads to quite an enjoyable cinema experience, but its needs something just a little bit more out of this world to create that feeling I got during Raiders.

And before I forget, John William's soundtrack still sends that little shiver down my spine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to be like Henry &#8216;Indiana&#8217; Jones.</p>
<p>Ford, just as he did in the first three Indy films portrays a well kept, intrepid and above all cunning adventurer, the dream combination of wits and skill.</p>
<p>This man can do just about anything he likes with a bull whip while at the same time speak about 200 dead languages.And Indy doesn&#8217;t hold back, whether it be using gun powder to trace a magnetic relic or drop an AK47 on the floor in such a way that he shoots a Russian in the foot, and he does it at ease.</p>
<p>&#8220;You don&#8217;t know im! You don&#8217;t know im!&#8221; screams Ray Winstone&#8217;s character &#8216;Mac&#8217; to one of Indy&#8217;s foes during a game of chicken between two jeeps inside a military hangar.</p>
<p>This long awaited fourth adventure sees Indiana along with prodigal son &#8216;Mutt&#8217; (It&#8217;s a human being, not some sort of talented animal that George Lucas probably wanted to throw in there) delve into a South American jungle whilst at logger heads with the soviets trying to get to the bottom of what it is exactly the crystal skull they have on them can do. Amazing are some of the opening stunts and I never knew how handy a fridge during a nuclear wipe-out could be.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the naive 10 year old I was when the original Indy trilogy was put to me in the late nineties so like my grandad I was left saying to myself &#8216;I ain&#8217;t avin that&#8217; at some of the plot revelations and just a couple of the stunts. Like driving off a cliff and landing the vehicle on a branch, and it wasn&#8217;t even Indiana who pulled that manoeuvre out of the bag.</p>
<p>Being a Brit, I enjoyed seeing Ray Winstone in there and have done a few impressions of him referring to Indiana as &#8216;Jonesy&#8217; since seeing the film.</p>
<p>The magic, excitement and interest of the Indiana Jones we know and love is still there and so leads to quite an enjoyable cinema experience, but its needs something just a little bit more out of this world to create that feeling I got during Raiders.</p>
<p>And before I forget, John William&#8217;s soundtrack still sends that little shiver down my spine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Of The Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6733</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Of The Dead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6733</guid>
		<description>UGH!!!  This movie was PATHETIC!  I should have learned my lesson with the newest Star Wars movies!  STOP MAKING MOVIES THAT WILL FASCINATE YOUR CHILDREN!!!  My son even hated this movie............  I would rather watch "There Will Be Blood (eventually)" while eating triscuits with no water.............BAD BAD BAD............  COME ON, ALIENS?  Magnetic heads............BEFRIENDING MONKEYS?  I want my money back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UGH!!!  This movie was PATHETIC!  I should have learned my lesson with the newest Star Wars movies!  STOP MAKING MOVIES THAT WILL FASCINATE YOUR CHILDREN!!!  My son even hated this movie&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;  I would rather watch &#8220;There Will Be Blood (eventually)&#8221; while eating triscuits with no water&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.BAD BAD BAD&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;  COME ON, ALIENS?  Magnetic heads&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;BEFRIENDING MONKEYS?  I want my money back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinderbrause</title>
		<link>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6724</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinderbrause</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6724</guid>
		<description>I watched the original movies over the weekend again and couldn't wait to see the new one. When I walked out of the cinema yesterday, I was in tears and I still can't get over it. That's the second time Lucasfilm ruined the heroes of my childhood. And I thought the disappointment couldn't be worse than Episode 1. How wrong I was!!!
Except for a decent performance by Harrison Ford this has nothing on the old movies. It's a ridiculous CGI-action flick for the Michael Bay/ Bruckheimer-generation that lacks heart, soul and character-development. Sure, there are some nice in-jokes but where’s the original wit of the former movies?
Not to mention the laughable plot. I get the idea of the 50s, the Russians, the Roswell-Aliens and Area 51. I even think, it's a good idea to see Indy in another decade. But come on! This is not Indy! He’s an archaeologist and an adventurer, not a Colonel, a agent and a double-agent! And he is certainly not Mulder!
This movie is Stargate meets X-Files meets Mummy meets National Treasure II meets Encounters of the 3. Kind. And they were all way better than this cheap rip-off!
And the ending! What were they thinking?!! It’s as if God appeared at the end of Raiders and thanked Indy for finding his lost Ark. It’s as if Jesus appeared at the end of Crusade to collect his grail.
I'm still wondering why ET himself didn't make an appearance. At least Tarzan did.
I don't expect realism in a Indy movie, but I expect believability within the created universe. And if Indy can survive anything without a scratch, where's the point? If anything is possible without consequences, it's not suspense anymore, it's pure boredom.
So. Thanks again, Lucasfilms, for ruining a perfectly good franchise. Don’t even think about “Henry Jones III – The Trilogy” or little green men shall take you away in their flying saucer and you shall never be seen again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the original movies over the weekend again and couldn&#8217;t wait to see the new one. When I walked out of the cinema yesterday, I was in tears and I still can&#8217;t get over it. That&#8217;s the second time Lucasfilm ruined the heroes of my childhood. And I thought the disappointment couldn&#8217;t be worse than Episode 1. How wrong I was!!!<br />
Except for a decent performance by Harrison Ford this has nothing on the old movies. It&#8217;s a ridiculous CGI-action flick for the Michael Bay/ Bruckheimer-generation that lacks heart, soul and character-development. Sure, there are some nice in-jokes but where’s the original wit of the former movies?<br />
Not to mention the laughable plot. I get the idea of the 50s, the Russians, the Roswell-Aliens and Area 51. I even think, it&#8217;s a good idea to see Indy in another decade. But come on! This is not Indy! He’s an archaeologist and an adventurer, not a Colonel, a agent and a double-agent! And he is certainly not Mulder!<br />
This movie is Stargate meets X-Files meets Mummy meets National Treasure II meets Encounters of the 3. Kind. And they were all way better than this cheap rip-off!<br />
And the ending! What were they thinking?!! It’s as if God appeared at the end of Raiders and thanked Indy for finding his lost Ark. It’s as if Jesus appeared at the end of Crusade to collect his grail.<br />
I&#8217;m still wondering why ET himself didn&#8217;t make an appearance. At least Tarzan did.<br />
I don&#8217;t expect realism in a Indy movie, but I expect believability within the created universe. And if Indy can survive anything without a scratch, where&#8217;s the point? If anything is possible without consequences, it&#8217;s not suspense anymore, it&#8217;s pure boredom.<br />
So. Thanks again, Lucasfilms, for ruining a perfectly good franchise. Don’t even think about “Henry Jones III – The Trilogy” or little green men shall take you away in their flying saucer and you shall never be seen again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6688</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 17:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6688</guid>
		<description>Yep, it's an Indiana Jones movie thru and thru.  The first three movies had a distinctive "look" to them - the film stock, the lighting, the colors, etc. - and I read somewhere that Spielberg asked Cinematographer Janusz Kaminski to study that look and apply it to "Crystal Skull".  It was spot on, it could've just as well been two years between "The Last Crusade" and this new one.  The scene near the end where Indy uses the skull as a key to open the door to the inner chamber is one of my favorite moments in the entire franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, it&#8217;s an Indiana Jones movie thru and thru.  The first three movies had a distinctive &#8220;look&#8221; to them - the film stock, the lighting, the colors, etc. - and I read somewhere that Spielberg asked Cinematographer Janusz Kaminski to study that look and apply it to &#8220;Crystal Skull&#8221;.  It was spot on, it could&#8217;ve just as well been two years between &#8220;The Last Crusade&#8221; and this new one.  The scene near the end where Indy uses the skull as a key to open the door to the inner chamber is one of my favorite moments in the entire franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bruce Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6671</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bruce Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 04:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6671</guid>
		<description>Whoever made the decision to release _National Treasure 2_ on DVD this past Tuesday didn't do their homework. This new Indy movie illustrates just how bad NT2 is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever made the decision to release _National Treasure 2_ on DVD this past Tuesday didn&#8217;t do their homework. This new Indy movie illustrates just how bad NT2 is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCM</title>
		<link>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6660</link>
		<dc:creator>RCM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scene-stealers.com/print-reviews/after-all-these-years-indiana-jones-makes-a-welcome-return/#comment-6660</guid>
		<description>Good review J.D., I just saw it (I really enjoyed it), and you said it best in the video review "It's not a perfect movie, but it is an Indiana Jones movie." It's not perfect but, it will not let down fans of the franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review J.D., I just saw it (I really enjoyed it), and you said it best in the video review &#8220;It&#8217;s not a perfect movie, but it is an Indiana Jones movie.&#8221; It&#8217;s not perfect but, it will not let down fans of the franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
