business plan oyster mushroom carter racing case study reddit home staging cover letter guide writing research paper storytelling argumentative essay multiple case study of lean six sigma implementation a little knowledge is a dangerous thing essay in english is homework helpful

Insomniac Movie Theater: Clifford

by Trevan McGee on November 4, 2010

in Columns,Insomniac Movie Theater

Tonight’s entry comes at the behest of my Mr. Eric Melin, who assured me that 1994’s “Clifford”, directed by Paul Flaherty, would be the kind of cult romp practically made for Insomniac Movie Theater. And boy, is it ever.

clifford poster 1994 “Clifford” features the dynamite comedy duo of Martin Short and Charles Grodin, the former enjoying the last bit of comedic magnetism before slipping into temporary obscurity, the latter enjoying the sweet success of the “Beethoven” franchise before disappearing into long-term obscurity.

Short plays the titular character, first as a geriatric priest, and then, more famously, as prepubescent boy despite being 44 years old at the time of movie’s release. The premise is simple enough: Short’s Clifford is a terrible child who desperately wants to go to Dinosaur World, a dinosaur theme park. His uncle, played by Grodin, wants to prove to his fiance Sarah (Mary Steenburgen) that he’s ready for children, so he offers to look after Clifford for a week while his parents are in Hawaii.

But wackiness ensues, as it’s known to do in movies like this. In “Clifford,” however, wackiness takes a much different form. Clifford is a sociopath; a calculating, mercilessly vengeful little bastard that stops at nothing to get what he wants. And when his uncle postpones their trip to Dinosaur World, Clifford snaps.

During the movie’s remaining hour, Clifford gets his uncle arrested, tricks him into traveling to San Francisco, destroys his life’s work, and most devious of all, convinces his fiance that he molested Clifford, or rather, allowed a biker gang to do so. (Ed. note–WTF? I have to see this movie.)

On paper, the movie has all the trappings of a fantastic black comedy in the same vein as Peter Berg’s “Very Bad Things,” but despite the movie’s best efforts, it can’t escape the comedic vacuum of Short’s gimmickry. The script and director Flaherty bend over backwards to incorporate all of Short’s well-worn foolishness: he awkwardly dances, he does over-reaching impressions, constant pratfalls –– essentially everything he’d been doing since his SCTV days (where Flaherty was a director). Take, for instance, this scene:

Despite scenes like that, there are some genuine laughs in “Clifford,” mostly because of Grodin, who may only be capable of one kind of character but he plays that character remarkably well. And cheap shots aside, Short and Grodin do work well together, when Grodin is commanding the scene and Short is reacting. This scene perfectly displays both Short’s ham-handedness and Grodin’s timing and ability as a straight man.

In terms of legendarily weird movies, “Clifford” is required viewing, if only for the fact that Short plays a character at least 40 years younger than his age at the time of filming and every actor is required to pretend that the idea isn’t preposterous. That alone is worth the price of admission –– or in this case, a Netflix stream.

But past that, “Clifford” is a movie that is largely wasted potential. It’s understandable why the movie didn’t go darker. Short had an image at the time of being a goofy character actor that starred in goofy, but family-friendly movies. Grodin was coming off the Beethoven sequel and was two years away from his CNBC talk show.

That said, had “Clifford” gone further, maybe it would have more to say for itself than a middle-aged, preteen protagonist. At least Grodin’s funny.

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Shelby November 4, 2010 at 9:56 am

Man, I think that movie has some genuinely classic and uproarious parts. I remember having laughing fits when my bro and I watched it during a thanksgiving sit-around-the-couch-during-lull-in-family-time session. Not great from beginning to end, but I think you *kind of* sell it short.

Great write-up. I will have to watch it again.


2 Ian McFarland November 5, 2010 at 10:02 am

This was the greatest movie of all time when my grandmother took me to see it when I was six-years-old. The greatest movie of all time.


Leave a Comment


Previous post:

Next post: